Pestana V. Bank Of America

Pestana V. Bank Of America

Written by  in category 
June 25, 2014

Pestana v. Bank of America: United Law Center Appeal Secures Reversal of Decision on Critical Piece of Unfair Competition Litigation in Mortgage Modification Process

 

United Law Center (ULC), the California consumer law firm leading the litigation charge against wrongful foreclosure, modification and title fraud, is celebrating the First Appellate District Court’s reversal of a lower court’s decision denying a cause of action under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, Sect. 17200.) in Pestana v. Bank of America N.A. (pending publication).

Sacramento, CA (PRWEB) June 20, 2014

United Law Center (ULC), the California consumer law firm leading the litigation charge against wrongful foreclosure, modification and title fraud, is celebrating the First Appellate District Court’s reversal of a lower court’s decision denying a cause of action under the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, Sect. 17200.) in Pestana v. Bank of America N.A. (pending publication). Pestana’s suit alleged that his bank and its servicer conducted unfair or fraudulent business practices by telling him that only if he stopped making mortgage payments would they consider him for a loan modification. Based on a previously published California case law by ULC, Bushell v. JPMorgan/Chase (3rd Dist. Ct. App. No. C070643), homeowners in California may sue on a fraud cause of action for false promise if a bank promises a homeowner a modification, but ends up denying the modification. ULC has four published cases in California. For more information please visit http://www.UnitedLawCenter.com.

Plaintiff Daniel Pestana had sued his mortgage loan servicers, Bank of America, N.A., and BAC Home Loans Servicing (LP) after he was denied a loan modification under the federal Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP), but offered a less favorable in-house modification, which he accepted. This is the common practice in the mortgage modification process:

1.    The bank allegedly told Pestana that they would not consider a modification of his mortgage unless he stopped making payments; in reliance on that promise Pestana stopped making payments and was promised a HAMP modification;

2.    For more than a year, the bank stalled in the evaluation process, allowing Pestana’s account to accrue additional late fees and penalties which damaged his credit while the bank was further enriched with increased servicing fees;

3.    The bank falsely told Pestana, a qualified borrower, that he did not qualify for a HAMP modification but instead was given a less favorable in-house modification;

While other causes of action denied by the trial court (Contra Costa County were sustained on appeal, ULC found success in this one very powerful cause of action, unfair competition or “unfair business practices”.

“The Pestana case could serve as yet another powerful example of how the banks are continuing to manipulate for profit and take advantage of California homeowners pursuing the modification process,” explained United Law Center’s managing partner and founder, Stephen J. Foondos. “We have represented thousands of homeowners who have suffered this same experience. We have found success in suing their bank and servicer directly for such violations with some receiving settlements into the six figures or more. “

Homeowners interested in determining if they have a case similar to Pestana or other landmark mortgage real estate cases like Bushell or Glaski can visit http://www.unitedlawcenter.com and take a few minutes to fill out a simple form about their experience with their mortgage company or servicer. They can also call United Law Center at 916-367-0622 to book a free, no-time limit consultation.

About United Law Center

United Law Center is the consumer law firm leading the litigation charge against wrongful foreclosure, modification and title fraud and other consumer oriented violations in California. With four published cases on the books in California, United Law Center is securing case law in favor of homeowners fighting banks to keep their homes. Millions of homeowners were affected by the fraudulent banking practices from 2003 to 2008 and United Law Center is on a mission to help right those wrongs. To determine if a homeowner has a valid case, they are encouraged to visit http://www.unitedlawcenter.com to schedule a free no-time-limit consultation.

You can find the original release here.

28 Responses

  1. Jeffreynix says:

    Русским ближе США, чем Грузия. Граждане России теперь лучше относятся к США, чем к Украине и Грузии. Социологи связывают это с различными военными конфликтами последних лет и информационным фоном, создаваемым российскими

  2. MerleCar says:

    Корея и Япония утверждают, что объект достиг максимальной высоты 2000000 м.
    Корея опубликовала фотографии, сделанные во время самого мощного запуска ракеты за последние пять лет.
    На необычных снимках, снятых из космоса, видно части Корейского полуострова и окрестные территории.
    В начале рабочей недели Пхеньян заявил, что провел испытания ракеты средней дальности «Хвасон-12».
    На полной мощи он может преодолевать тысячи миль, и способен затронуть Гуам (США)..
    Это учение снова подняло тревогу у мира.
    За последние несколько недель Пхеньян осуществил рекордное количество ракетных запусков — 7 штук — что резко осудили практически все страны мира.
    Что хочет Корея?
    Почему Северная Корея выпустила так много ракет в этом месяце?
    Корея сосредоточится на экономике в 2022 году
    ООН запрещает Северной Корее запуски баллистического и ядерного оружия и ввела строгие санкции. Но Северная Корея регулярно игнорирует запрет.
    Официальные лица США в понедельник заявили, что недавний рост активности сулит продолжение переговоров с Пхеньяном.
    Что же случилось при запуске Hwasong-12?
    ЮК и Япония сразу же сообщили об испытаниях в воскресенье после обнаружения его в своих противоракетных системах.
    По их мнению, он пролетел умеренное расстояние для такого типа ракет, преодолев расстояние около (497 миль) и достигнув высоты 2000 км, прежде чем приземлился в водах у берегов Японии. На предельной мощи и по обычному маршруту ракета может пролететь порядка 4 тыс км.
    Для чего СК сделала запуск?
    Аналитик Северной Кореи Анкит Панда сказал, что отсутствие г-на Кима и язык, который искользовался в СМИ для описания запуска, позволяют предположить, что это испытание было предназначено для проверки того, что БРСД функционирует правильно, а не для того, чтобы продемонстрировать новую силу.
    Данную новость опубликовало агентство Агентство новостей Агентство новостей Агентство новостей СОбытия odelburg.ru